Commentary on court rulings, fabricated evidence and the long fight for accountability.
Latest posts
Fifteen posts on Kerala court rulings that repeat overturned findings, a police report challenged as fabricated, and a case that has run for three decades, plus Natural Law awareness writing and cinema. Filter by topic below.
“Relational Defensive Driving is about empowering individuals with the rational foresight inherent in Natural Law. Just as we teach people how to navigate physical roads safely, we must teach young minds how to navigate the complex roads of human affection with wisdom, dignity, and self-preservation.”
Introduction: When Love Becomes a Road Without Warning Signs
A reported tragedy in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, in which a man allegedly pushed his girlfriend into a deep gorge after she refused to continue their relationship, raises a disturbing question for society: could better awareness, early recognition of danger, and timely intervention help prevent some relationship-related tragedies?
The incident, as reported, is a reminder of the devastating consequences that can follow when one person’s desire for control overrides another person’s freedom, dignity, and right to life. Yet the broader lesson extends beyond any single incident. How can individuals learn to recognise dangerous relationship dynamics before emotional pressure becomes coercion, coercion becomes violence, and warning signs become irreversible tragedy?
An awareness article by Jabir P for www.NaturalLaw.In, an initiative dedicated to promoting moral reasoning, practical wisdom, human dignity, and personal safety in human relationships.
Relational Defensive Driving: Protecting Dignity, Safety, and the Human Spirit Through Natural Law
A High Court Judge, Multiple Benches, and Decades of Shielding Fraudsters.
A fake police report was recycled six times over 20 years to dismiss a ₹75-Crore theft case. Lower-court orders set aside without looking at the facts. Even summons for the accused to appear in the lower court were blocked. Files that “disappear”, eaten by termites. The State itself admits the officer was punished for misconduct on this file.
A prolonged litigation can mean years of legal expenses, lost opportunities, emotional distress, and uncertainty. A citizen’s life is not an experiment. A court case is not a lottery. If we expect citizens to respect the rule of law, the judiciary must hold its own accountable.
🚨 WHEN THE GUARDRAILS BECOME THE GANG. 🚨
⚖️ A High Court Judge, Multiple Benches, and Decades of Shielding Fraudsters.
A fake police report was recycled six times over 20 years to dismiss a ₹75-Crore theft case. Lower-court orders set aside without looking at the facts. Even summons for the accused to appear in the lower court were blocked. Files that “disappear” — eaten by termites. The State itself admits the officer was punished for misconduct on this file.
A prolonged litigation can mean years of legal expenses, lost opportunities, emotional distress, and uncertainty. A citizen's life is not an experiment. A court case is not a lottery. If we expect citizens to respect the rule of law, the judiciary must hold its own accountable.
When a former Union Law Minister loses trust in the Supreme Court, what hope is left for everyday citizens?
In Kerala, a High Court Judge directed a subordinate to dismiss a ₹75-Crore theft case using a fabricated police report.
The same fake report was used 6 times over 20 years to quash justice. The State admits the officer was disciplined for misconduct on this file. The official excuse for the missing files? “Eaten by termites.”
This isn’t just a procedural delay. It represents a 30-year breakdown in institutional trust. If we expect citizens to respect the rule of law, the legal system must first hold its own officers accountable. 🔥🔥🔥
A SYSTEM BETRAYED: WHEN "TERMITES" REPLACE JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY! 🐜📂 ⚖️
When a former Union Law Minister loses trust in the Supreme Court, what hope is left for everyday citizens? In Kerala, a High Court Judge directed a subordinate to dismiss a ₹75-Crore theft case using a fabricated police report.
The same fake report was used 6 times over 20 years to quash justice. The State admits the officer was disciplined for misconduct on this file. The official excuse for the missing files? "Eaten by termites."
This isn't just a procedural delay—it represents a 30-year breakdown in institutional trust. If we expect citizens to respect the rule of law, the legal system must first hold its own officers accountable. 🔥🔥🔥
For three decades, a fraud case worth above INR 75 crore (Dh.30 million) has been shielded from accountability. Instead of justice, what unfolded was a troubling saga of protectionism, vanished files, and repeated dismissals.
Authorities upheld a narrative without evidence, disregarding rulings from the #SupremeCourt, #Delhi #HighCourt, and even international treaties such as the India–UAE agreement. When crucial documents disappeared, the explanation offered was almost surreal: termites had eaten them.
Over twenty years, the same case was quashed multiple times, not because of new facts, but seemingly because persistence itself was treated as a crime. This pattern raises a disturbing question: is this judicial discretion, or the operation of a “#judicialmafia” under constitutional cover?
The implications extend far beyond #Kerala. For #NRIs and the #GlobalCommunity, this case has become a symbol of how systemic failures can erode trust in India’s justice system.
AI acts as a coffee wellness concierge, recommending blends for energy, mood, intimacy, or longevity.
At “Coffea Cinematic Lounge,” we’re merging the hard science of the Coffea Hormone Series with the immersive atmosphere of Aurora’s Edge—The White Silence. We are creating more than a brand; we are creating a Transmedia Experience. In this ecosystem, the coffee is the “fuel” and the cinematic ambient is the “environment.” Together, they form a Global Premium Coffee Universe where the consumer is the protagonist of their own performance story.
🌐Coffea Cinematic Lounge tonight.
🎥 Courtesy to Aurora’s Edge for making it happen. The World’s First Cinematic Coffee Brand.
“Once they ruled the Pirate Coast. Now they rule the system. But when the truth surfaces… even a prince can become a fugitive. This is the Pirate Coast Protocol.”
FUGITIVE PRINCE: THE PIRATE COAST PROTOCOL
A Flagship AI-Driven #GeopoliticalThriller. “Once they ruled the Pirate Coast. Now they rule the system. But when the truth surfaces… even a prince can become a fugitive. This is the Pirate Coast Protocol.”
What stands exposed is not a single error, a rogue officer, or an unfortunate delay, but a systemic decay where lies are validated, evidence is buried, and truth-seekers are punished.
When courts repeat falsehoods, excuse vanished records, reverse their own findings, and vilify the complainant, justice does not merely fail. It decomposes.
When crimes wear robes, accountability must speak louder. This case is the autopsy report of a dying justice system.
🧨 Justice Eaten Alive: How Termites, Lies, and Judges Colluded to Kill a Case in Kerala 🧨
For thirty years, one man has endured injustice across borders. Honoured as a hero by UAE Courts, yet stripped of a $100M empire by Abu Dhabi Police. Fraud whitewashed by the administration to protect its image.
India’s Supreme Court recognized him as a creditor, but Delhi High Court chose diplomacy over justice. In Kerala, evidence was mocked as “eaten by termites,” by police. One Magistrate dared to expose the fraud, and disappeared from the record.
Kerala High Court repeated the same lie three times. Another Bench swallowed it whole. Case dismissed. The India–UAE case-law became waste paper. Yet the evidence still stands. The truth still breathes.
This campaign calls for accountability. Because truth cannot rot. But liars will. STORY NOT OVER.
💛⚖️ ONE MAN. THIRTY YEARS. ZERO JUSTICE. A CASE THAT OUTLIVED ITS JUDGES. BUT THE EVIDENCE STILL SPEAKS.⚖️💛
For thirty years, one man has endured injustice across borders. Honoured as a hero by UAE Courts — yet stripped of a $100M empire by Abu Dhabi Police. Fraud whitewashed by the administration to protect its image.
India’s Supreme Court recognized him as a creditor, but Delhi High Court chose diplomacy over justice. In Kerala, evidence was mocked as “eaten by termites,” by police. One Magistrate dared to expose the fraud — and disappeared from the record.
Kerala High Court repeated the same lie three times. Another Bench swallowed it whole. Case dismissed. The India–UAE case-law became waste paper. Yet the evidence still stands. The truth still breathes.
This campaign calls for accountability. Because truth cannot rot. But liars will. STORY NOT OVER.
August 15, 1975. As India marked 28 years of freedom, a different kind of revolution unfolded on screen. Ramesh Sippy’s Sholay, armed with Salim–Javed’s razor-sharp script, stormed into theatres as India’s most legendary masala blockbuster.
Bombay, 1976. Minerva Theatre had become the holy shrine of cinema, its 1,500 seats packed for every show, every day. One year after its release, Sholay still ruled Minerva Theatre.
To a teenage boy who saw the film a year later from Minerva, the struggle to watch it was almost heroic. The black market turned ₹3 tickets into ₹100 plus luxuries. Yet the pull of Veeru’s wit, Jai’s stoic strength, Basanti’s vivacity, Thakur’s resolve, and Gabbar’s unforgettable menace was irresistible.
Sholay was more than cinema. It was an immersive spectacle. The stereophonic roar of the train ambush, the melancholy of Radha’s silence, the eternal promise of “Yeh Dosti” carved deep into the nation’s memory.
Now, as the uncut restoration tours international festivals, that teenager, now several decades older, understands what happened in that darkened hall. He didn’t just watch a movie. He witnessed history.
What’s a greater crime? The original fraud, or the institutional lie that covers it up? A story of how the very system designed to find truth can be manipulated to bury it. ⚖️
It began with a decades-old fraud. Central to the cover-up: a forged police report. Shockingly, both a Magistrate Court and a High Court accepted it as truth. Case dismissed. 🤯
A glimmer of hope: one courageous magistrate saw through the deception. He took a stand against powerful interests and moved the case forward, determined to uncover the truth. A rare act of defiance. ✨
But the system pushed back. Another High Court judge fell for the same tactic. The case was finally terminated by a new magistrate who doubled down on the official lie, throwing out the entire case. A devastating blow to justice. 🛑
When courts endorse falsehoods, they betray the Constitution they swear to protect. This isn’t just one case. It’s a global warning. If this is justice, what is injustice? 🌍
🏛️ High Case Backlog in India’s Judiciary: The Underrated Role of Unprofessional Judicial Appointments
⚖️ India's judiciary is entrusted with upholding the rule of law and delivering justice efficiently. Yet, with over 45 million pending cases clogging its courtrooms, the system is clearly under strain.
🚨 While infrastructure deficits, procedural delays, and lack of manpower are well-documented causes, one often overlooked driver deserves sharper scrutiny: 🏚️"Unprofessional judicial appointments."
⚠️ The Link Between Backlog and Appointment Practices:
🤐 Judicial appointments are foundational to the functioning of courts. When those selected for the bench lack the necessary competence, integrity, or temperament, the result is not just poor decision-making—it’s systemic dysfunction.
🧱 How Unprofessional Appointments Exacerbate the Backlog:
👉 Inefficient case handling: Judges unfamiliar with procedural norms or case law often delay proceedings unintentionally.
👉 Weak or unclear rulings: Poorly reasoned judgments trigger appeals, pushing cases to higher courts and perpetuating the backlog.
👉 Inadequate court management: Judges with limited experience or training may mismanage dockets, causing scheduling chaos.
👉 Loss of public trust: Perceived judicial incompetence deters litigants from pursuing speedy redress or encourages parallel informal systems.
In recent cases, successive judges, yes, even some from the State of Kerala, have chosen to uphold findings that their very own judicial peers had previously set aside.
This constitutes not only a breach of legal due diligence but also an erosion of public trust in judicial neutrality. Citizens continue to suffer legal injustice because the courts either ignored or deliberately chose not to engage with material evidence on record. These judgments, if anything, read like bad school essays.
The kind where the student didn’t read the book but tried to fake it with copy-pasted nonsense. The only difference? These “students” are wearing judicial robes and signing off on people’s futures.
Judicial Misconduct Must Not Hide Behind Robes.
A NATION WATCHES WHILE JUSTICE COLLAPSES: KERALA’S LEGAL SYSTEM IN RUINS
In recent cases, successive judges, yes, even some from the State of Kerala, have chosen to uphold findings that their very own judicial peers had previously set aside.
This constitutes not only a breach of legal due diligence but also an erosion of public trust in judicial neutrality. Citizens continue to suffer legal injustice because the courts either ignored or deliberately chose not to engage with material evidence on record. These judgments, if anything, read like bad school essays.
The kind where the student didn't read the book but tried to fake it with copy-pasted nonsense. The only difference? These "students" are wearing judicial robes and signing off on people’s futures. ... Judicial Misconduct Must Not Hide Behind Robes.
How many more lives must be shattered by court rulings that parrot a police report written by a proven liar?
Judges, even in the High Court of Kerala, have recycled the lies of a corrupt Sub Inspector of Police, ignoring evidence, ignoring overturned judgments, and ignoring the truth. This is not just negligence. This is a betrayal of justice.
Such judicial conduct not only contravenes the principles of natural justice but raises troubling questions about institutional integrity. The repetition of previously nullified findings, dressed in new judicial language but founded on the same discredited material, reflects either alarming laziness or willful neglect.
When courts endorse fraud, the gavel becomes a weapon. We demand that those in the judiciary who refused to examine legal evidence or follow binding precedents be retrained or removed.
Justice isn’t blind; but these judges clearly are.
Article authored by Jabir P.K., dated . Last updated: 15/07/2025.
In a shocking series of judicial failures, courts in Kerala, including the Hon’ble High Court, have consistently legitimized a demonstrably fraudulent police report authored by a Sub-Inspector with a known record of corruption.
This report, devoid of evidentiary basis and refuted by multiple credible sources, has been used as the foundation for prolonged persecution against an individual who stands innocent, unindicted by any credible charge. Despite the availability of irrefutable documentary evidence and binding judicial pronouncements, both domestic and international, the courts have chosen to affirm a known falsehood. It erodes the sacred trust that citizens place in the judiciary to protect the innocent and uphold truth.
At the heart of this legal battle lies a complainant whose claims are undeniably strong. They presented not only verified ownership documents but also invoked landmark international rulings that bolster their position. Their detailed submission included irrefutable documentary evidence of legal entitlement and a robust corpus of jurisprudential support, notably drawing upon Delhi High Court proceedings under Article 226. Crucially, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India had already validated these very arguments as far back as 1996, firmly establishing the complainant’s rightful status and business claims in a foreign land. To further solidify their case, the complainant even brought in numerous witnesses who testified before the magistrate court, prompting the court to take decisive action against the perpetrator. But what followed wasn’t justice. It was obstruction.
When common people commit fraud, the law can punish them. But when those entrusted to protect the law betray it, punishment becomes hollow. The crime shifts from personal greed to an offence against the very soul of the Constitution.
A judicial signature written in ignorance or convenience carries the same moral weight as a forged document: both distort reality to destroy a life. Each judgment signed without diligence, each order passed without study or conscience, is not merely an error. It is the misuse of sovereign trust.
The Constitution did not grant robes for comfort but for accountability. When judicial officers neglect evidence, echo falsehoods, or lend legitimacy to deceit, they do not merely fail their duty. They commit a fraud upon the court itself. Such acts corrode faith in the justice system more deeply than any criminal act ever could.
For the innocent who wait decades for remedy, the wound inflicted by indifference feels worse than injustice. It is betrayal sanctified by authority. And when justice itself betrays, the people lose not only their rights but their reason to believe.
A case from Kerala highlights a deeply troubling pattern spanning three decades. A High Court Judge instructed a subordinate magistrate to dismiss a 30-year-old case involving a ₹75-Crore theft.
“The man falls silent; but the truth still speaks.”
A business deal in 1995 became a crucible of cruelty. An Indian-origin UAE investor wins a court case in Abu Dhabi against a royal-linked scam, but is dragged into a nightmare.
Tortured in silence, his fingernails ripped out, his body broken, his breath stolen by cloth and fists. He woke up in a hospital, barely alive.
Multiple courts ruled in his favour, demanding accountability, chains on the perpetrators, and freedom for the victim. But the regime ignored its own laws, mocked the gavel and openly defied the court.
Behind the curtain of power, the “ELUSIVE FUGITIVE PRINCE” remained untouchable. In the UAE, justice flickers, but tyranny burns bright.